Would love to see an example of it working with a real PR, i.e., submitted by 
an outside contributor not a test PR, so see how the interaction ends up going, 
will consider this for other open-source projects I maintain.

Damian

-----Original Message-----
From: Amogh Desai <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2026 3:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: New: AGENTS.md overhaul + Copilot catches AI-slop PRs automatically

This is amazing, Kaxil! Thank you!

Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai


On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 9:38 PM Vincent Beck <[email protected]> wrote:

> Very much needed! Thank you Kaxil!
>
> On 2026/02/25 08:16:47 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> > Very cool :).
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 4:14 AM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > tl;dr: AI coding tools now get proper Airflow guardrails via
> AGENTS.md, and
> > > Copilot code review will automatically flag common mistakes in PRs
> > > -- including AI-slop patterns as long as we add Copilot as reviewer.
> > >
> > > We've been getting more AI-generated PRs lately, and reviewers
> > > keep catching the same things: N+1 queries, architecture boundary
> violations,
> > > assert in production code, fabricated diffs, etc. I wanted to
> > > automate that.
> > >
> > > I've been using AGENTS.md (CLAUDE.md , Cursor rules, skills and
> > > such)
> with
> > > Cursor, Claude Code, and Copilot and various other AI harnesses
> > > since
> last
> > > year and have iterated on it many times. Three PRs landed today:
> > >
> > >    - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/62440 -- AGENTS.md
> overhaul.
> > >    Replaced the sparse doc-index with concrete guidance:
> > > environment
> setup,
> > >    architecture boundaries, coding/testing standards, commit
> conventions.
> > >    Added nested AGENTS.md for Execution API (Cadwyn versioning)
> > > and providers.
> > >    - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/62442 -- Copilot code
> review
> > >    instructions. Added .github/instructions/
> code-review.instructions.md
> > >    scoped to review only. Covers architecture violations, N+1
> > > queries, run_id
> > >    scoping, unbounded caches, and AI-slop signals (fabricated
> > > diffs, narrating
> > >    comments, over-engineered solutions, etc.).
> > >    - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/62443 -- Symlink
> CLAUDE.md to
> > >    AGENTS.md so Claude Code reads the same file.
> > >
> > > To validate the Copilot instructions, I opened a test PR (
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/62447) with 8 deliberately
> planted
> > > violations. Copilot caught all 8:
> > >
> > >    1. N+1 query (loop calling get_task_instances() per dag run)
> > >    2. time.time() instead of time.monotonic()
> > >    3. assert in production code
> > >    4. Unbounded @lru_cache (no maxsize)
> > >    5. run_id query without dag_id
> > >    6. Narrating comments
> > >    7. Import inside function body
> > >    8. No tests for new behavior
> > >
> > > This won't replace human review, but should save time on
> > > mechanical catches. If you have patterns you'd like Copilot to
> > > flag, PRs to .github/instructions/code-review.instructions.md are welcome.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kaxil
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
________________________________
 Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of companies. 
Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a broker or dealer and 
does not transact any securities related business directly whatsoever. This 
communication is the property of Strike and its affiliates, and does not 
constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security 
in any jurisdiction. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed 
and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise 
protected from disclosure. Distribution or copying of this communication, or 
the information contained herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient 
is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
immediately notify Strike at [email protected], and delete and 
destroy any copies hereof.
________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments are 
intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The information 
contained in this transmission is confidential in nature and protected from 
further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102, 113 U.S. Stat. 1338 
(1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or other legal privilege. Your 
use or disclosure of this information for any purpose other than that intended 
by its transmittal is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to fines and/or 
penalties under federal and state law. If you are not the intended recipient of 
this transmission, please DESTROY ALL COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction 
to the sender via return transmittal.

Reply via email to