Hi Vikram,

Small correction, the content under multi team and deadline alerts seems to
have been swapped.

Apart from that, everything looks good.

Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai


On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 5:49 AM Vikram Koka via dev <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hey everyone,
>
> Thank you for attending the dev call on the 26th of February. I updated
> our meeting notes on the Airflow wiki and the link for those notes is here
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=373886699#Airflow3.xDevCall:Meetingnotes-Summary.32
> >
>
> To everyone who attended the meeting, please check the summary and add
> anything I may have missed. For those who could not join, please let us
> know if you disagree with anything discussed and agreed upon in
> the meeting. Also, please do ask questions if something is unclear.
>
> Our next meeting is scheduled for the 12th of March at the same time.
> Please note that due to the US daylight saving time change, this time may
> be off by an hour for your time zone. It is scheduled for 9 a.m. Pacific
> Time on 12th of March.
>
> The agenda is already populated, primarily with Airflow 3.2 AIP updates. If
> you would like to keep this call to discuss a particular topic, please let
> me know if you would like to add anything to the agenda
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=373886699#Airflow3.xDevCall:Meetingnotes-12March2026
> >
> .
>
> Best regards,
> Vikram
> --
> Below is the summary from the last call:
>
>    - Swim lane updates:
>       - UI Test framework (Rahul Vats):
>          - Rahul shared that the UI test framework has reached a
>          significant milestone, now at 121 test cases after removing
> pagination and
>          sorting cases from the meta issue, which has now been closed with
> all
>          scenarios marked as complete.
>          - Current work is focused on addressing test flakiness and
>          reducing execution time by increasing the number of workers from
> the
>          current default.
>          - Rahul plans to create a new meta issue next week for
>          contributions to unit tests as a follow-up to this work.
>          - On the performance front, Rahul and Pierre have created a meta
>          issue for large DAG and task performance improvements, with 5
> issues
>          already closed and around 4 still open. The target is to close the
>          remaining items before the 3.2 release.
>       - AIP-72 Task SDK update (Amogh)
>          - Amogh shared that the AIP-72 project board in Github is
>          officially closed today, having completed over 300 issues and
> PRs, which
>          was significantly larger in scope than initially anticipated.
> Phase 2
>          planning for expanding to DAG processing and Triggerer are
> underway with
>          initial thinking of focusing on the 3.3 timeframe.
>          - Analysis of the remaining imports shows minimal dependencies,
>          with the main blocker being that Dag.test still requires
> Airflow Core, and
>          some dependencies based on the Deadline Alerts executor work.
>       - UI / API swim lane update (Pierre / Brent)
>          - Brent shared that UI plugins dependency work has been completed
>          and that the Data Partitions UI work is in progress for 3.2.
>          - Graph view performance optimization for large Dags is in flight
>          and is a stretch goal for the 3.2 release.
>       - Airflow 3.2 development updates:
>       - AIP-76 Asset Partitions (Wei Lee / TP):
>          - Wei shared a recorded video of the Asset Partitions work which
>          demonstrated completed work for Date based partitioned DAGs.
>          - The outstanding element of work seemed to be documentation.
>       - Multi-team (Niko / Vincent):
>          - Dennis noted that a PR has been pending review for almost a
>          month. Amogh provided detailed feedback requiring significant
> changes, and
>          while Jens had approved the PR, additional reviews were still
> needed. The
>          team agreed that Dennis could proceed with follow-up PRs for
> incremental
>          improvements in parallel.
>       - Deadline Alerts (Dennis Ferruzzi):
>       - Niko shared that the multi-team work had entered UAT phase with
>          ongoing, active community testing. All features scoped for 3.2
> were
>          implemented and marked as "experimental" as previously discussed.
> With
>          respect to executor support, Niko shared that Celery was
> completed,
>          Kubernetes was in progress, and Edge discussions were ongoing.
>          - Niko also clarified that multi-team configuration required
>          deployment manager involvement and was not intended to be
> dynamically
>          configurable.
>       - Release Management (Rahul / Kaxil):
>          - Rahul shared that the 3.2 timeline was on track, with the beta
>          branch having been cut.
>          - Vikram shared that approximately 1,500 meaningful commits were
>          included between 3.1 and 3.2, excluding CI and dev tooling,
> which made this
>          significantly larger than a normal, minor release.
>       - Discussion topics:
>    - Helm chart release (Bugra)
>          - Bugra presented the current state of the Helm chart, with
>          version 1.19 recently released and proposed moving to a major
> version i.e.
>          2.0 to drop deprecated features.
>          - Jed recommended at least one more 1.x release with proper
>          deprecation warnings in place before making such a break.
> Jens supported a
>          1.20 release followed by a 2.0 clean up.
>          - The decision was to have the core Helm chart contributors
>          schedule a dedicated call to align on the release strategy.
> Bugra took this
>          action item.
>       - Security / Isolation level for 3.2 (Jarek)
>          - Jarek raised the current gap in security isolation, specifically
>          that there is no isolation between tasks running on the same
> machine.
>          - Ash said that he had a PR implementing a feature for worker
>          process memory protection, with additional work needed for
> DAG processor
>          and triggerer isolation.
>          - After significant discussion, the team decided to defer the
>          follow-on work to 3.3 given the complexity and the required
> integration
>          with the DAG processor and Triggerer changes already targeted for
> that
>          release.
>
>
> Vikram Koka
> Chief Strategy Officer
> Email: [email protected]
>
>
> <https://www.astronomer.io/>
>

Reply via email to