Generally lack of comments or even 'looks good' means that no-one had time to look at it - and not that they have no objections. No objections assumption is reserved for LAZY CONSENSUS when consensus seems to be achieved
On Fri, Jun 5, 2026, 13:40 Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > To be honest - I do not think there was enough of a discussion on it to > start vote thread. And certainly not recently. No-one had any comments on > it after scoping down and placing it in Confluence > > J. > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2026, 13:23 Dilnaz Amanzholova via dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I’m calling vote on AIP-85: DAG importer >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/_Q7OEg >> >> You can also review the design document here >> < >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K6-4cGoZItXGQHZjOydNbc7rGtOp_XKfFurMnFptKe0/edit?tab=t.0 >> > >> . >> >> Current discussion thread (after scoping down): >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wtfog0qjrf3oh7355db0x6mqk3o7l2dt >> Original discussion thread (with wider "extendable DAG parsing controls" >> title): https://lists.apache.org/thread/bn0oo47j48xh8r335gd2jrrjz0o7vnjl >> >> The vote will run for 5 days, closing on Wednesday, 10th June 2026, at >> 10:00 UTC. >> >> Everyone is encouraged to vote, but only PMC members and Committers' votes >> are considered binding. Please vote accordingly. >> >> [ ] +1 Approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> >> Kind regards, >> Dilnaz Amanzholova >> >
