Wow, that's super helpful! Thanks for doing this, Kaxil.

Aaron Chen <[email protected]> 於 2026年6月10日週三 下午11:57寫道:

> Amazing! This is a really useful feature!
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 8:06 AM Rahul Vats <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Nice one!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rahul Vats
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 at 19:42, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Probably we should add some monitoring to see if length of running of
> our
> > > jobs is increasing above some recent trend - I have no idea when this
> > > started to happen, but with all things changing and runner queue we are
> > > experiencing having such an automated warning on "main" builds would
> help
> > > us to catch things like this earlier.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 3:50 PM Amogh Desai <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > 50% is an amazing improvement, thanks Kaxil!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > Amogh Desai
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 7:19 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Nice!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 3:02 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi team,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just merged https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/68261 which
> > > > should
> > > > > > drop CI run time (where it runs all tests) by 50% from ~62 min to
> > ~29
> > > > > mins
> > > > > > in the case of MySQL. But same applies for Postgres & Sqlite.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The motivation was that our MySQL tests were timing out on some
> PRs
> > > > > because
> > > > > > it took more than 60 mins.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > While there is still room for improvement and I'd like the time
> to
> > > > > decrease
> > > > > > further, we need to be careful not to unintentionally lose test
> > > > > isolation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *It doesn't apply for all PRs that are filtered by selective
> > checks -
> > > > > > example a Yandex provider change. So they might not see these
> > > > > improvements.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Kaxil
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to