Thanks for spotting this and explaining it so clearly, appreciate it, Ash.

Agreed, no objection. After your explanation, I realised the fault. It's
more than just
"pandas 3 doesn't work with xcom" - people could've been using pandas 3
functionally
and not for xcom.

Forcing pandas 2 on people already running pandas 3 fine on 3.3.0 is worse
than the
rollback risk we were worried about. So let's revert 70791 and merge 70558
(after a review).

The cross version error message is probably a separate issue or we fold it
in 70558.

Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai


On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 4:47 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> So my issue is 70791 is that it itself is (or will be) a regression on
> 3.3.0
>
> By limiting Pandas to < 3 in this change in a point release, we will end
> up breaking any dag that was using Pandas 3.0 features (because 3.0.5 will
> happily install with 3.3.0), but with the proposed version limitation, it
> would get forcibly downgraded. Either this will result in unsatisfiable
> constraints if the users has `pandas>=3.0`, or perhaps worse it would
> silently downgrade.
>
> And as for the worry about downgrade breaking things, yes, but Pandas 3.0
> was released on 21st January 2026. By forcing a downgrade now we are
> re-breaking anything people may have already dealt with this. To me it's
> not really any different to "I changed my dag to push something new to
> xcom, if I roll back the dag I can't use those XComs anymore”.
>
> In this regard Airflow should behave as a library, not an application —
> and be lenient in the versions we work with.
>
> If we’d applied this version constraint 6 months ago/just after pandas 3.0
> was released it’s fine, but almost 7 months after the fact it seems
> actively harmful for compat/expectations.
>
> I think we should revert 70791 and merge
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70558/ in instead. If everyone
> agrees/doesn’t disagree, then I can handle these changes as you are
> travelling Jarek. Perhaps we need to extend it with. “When attempting to
> load Pandas2 df when Pandas3 is the active version throw a nice error”.
> TBD? (Unless anyone already knows how this will behave?)
>
> -ash
>
> > On 4 Aug 2026, at 08:04, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> A (temporary) -1 on anything including
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70791 please — I  want to catch
> up
> > with the logic and thinking there (I understand this was discussed on the
> > dev call)
> >
> > FYI Ash - I think this is important to mention that it also impacts
> Airlfow
> > -> not only providers, so if we have other proposals - I think it would
> be
> > great to get it sorted before RC. I am flying in about few hours, and
> then
> > i will also be available "sometimes" so it would be great to know if we
> > need to do some follow-ups - might delay 3.1.1 as currently there is a
> > runtime check in Airflow preventing pandas3 to be used **when**
> > serialization is used.
> >
> >
> > J.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 6:16 AM Steve Ahn <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding) on airbyte 6.0.1rc1.
> >>
> >> Tested against the RC wheel on 3.3.0: a cancelled Airbyte sync now
> yields a
> >> "cancelled" event rather than falling through the success branch
> (#69786).
> >>
> >> I also verified my changes in amazon 9.34.0rc1 (#69676, deferred
> Redshift
> >> statement
> >> is cancelled on kill) and common.sql 2.1.0rc1 (#69736, value-check
> >> tolerance no
> >> longer inverts for negative expected values) — both behave correctly
> >> against their
> >> RC wheels. Not voting on those two since they carry #70791, which Ash
> has
> >> asked to
> >> hold.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Steve Ahn
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 4:17 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Correction: (We discussed these at the dev call and in the
> PRs/issues—not
> >>> on the dev list, though.) Perhaps it's a good idea that we are doing
> this
> >>> now. But if you have any thoughts, perhaps it's better to discuss them
> >> in a
> >>> separate thread :).
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 1:15 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sure. Take your time Ash.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just to give you more context (we can discuss this on Slack if you
> have
> >>>> questions or doubts, rather than here).
> >>>>
> >>>> I think there are no "perfect" solutions here due to how "pandas" is
> >>> built
> >>>> into our XCom processing and potential migration issues. There are
> >>> **only**
> >>>> trade-offs. We discussed a few of those at the devlist. I'm also not
> >>>> entirely happy with what we came up with, but I think the issue here
> is
> >>>> choosing the "lesser evil".
> >>>>
> >>>> Unless of course we can find a solution that covers all potential
> >> issues
> >>>> here:
> >>>>
> >>>> a) risk of accidental migration issues to Pandas 3 by people without
> >>>> realising that it breaks both XCom **and** incompatibilities with
> >> Pandas
> >>> 3
> >>>> b) risk of "no easy downgrade" path when people - even knowingly -
> >>> migrate
> >>>> to Pandas 3, only to realize later they need to downgrade.
> >>>> c) risk of not supporting Pandas 3 "today" for those who need it
> >>>>
> >>>> We must weigh all these risks. The trade-off we developed considers
> >> risks
> >>>> (a) and (b) more impactful than (c). Our approach is to deliberately
> >> add
> >>>> support for Pandas 3 in Airflow 3.4 while temporarily mitigating (a)
> >> and
> >>>> (b).
> >>>> But other trade-offs here are possible of course.
> >>>>
> >>>> J,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 12:33 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> A (temporary) -1 on anything including
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70791 please — I  want to
> >> catch
> >>>>> up with the logic and thinking there (I understand this was discussed
> >> on
> >>>>> the dev call)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -ash
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 3 Aug 2026, at 08:43, Andrew Chang <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for preparing the release, Jarek!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tested apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure 14.1.0rc1 on
> >> released
> >>>>>> Airflow 3.3.0 with breeze --use-airflow-version. I focused on my
> >>> change
> >>>>>> #70301, which registers the wasb remote logging scheme.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The wasb scheme resolves to WasbRemoteLogIO through provider
> >> dispatch,
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>> the legacy discovery path is not called. from_config() builds the IO
> >>>>> from
> >>>>>> the [logging] section as expected. I also ran a real upload and read
> >>>>>> round-trip against Azurite, and the log content matched.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Andrew
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> 於 2026年8月3日週一 上午8:37寫道:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hey all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages with
> >> release
> >>>>>>> preparation date 2026-08-01. This email is calling a vote on the
> >>>>>>> release,
> >>>>>>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on
> >>>>>>> 2026-08-06 00:40 UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been
> >> received.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This wave contains 48 providers. There are no breaking changes in
> >> any
> >>>>>>> of them - all bumps are minor or patch level.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Four of the providers are re-cuts of release candidates that were
> >>>>>>> prepared in the 2026-07-22 wave but never published, so they are at
> >>>>>>> rc2 rather than rc1:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-clickhousedb 1.0.1rc2
> >>>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-common-ai 0.7.0rc2
> >>>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-google 22.3.0rc2
> >>>>>>> - apache-airflow-providers-openlineage 2.20.0rc2
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For those four, the testing status issue carries over the check
> >> marks
> >>>>>>> from the previous wave, so only the genuinely new commits are left
> >>>>>>> unchecked.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/2026-08-01
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> *apache_airflow_providers-2026-08-01-source.tar.gz* is the full
> >>> source
> >>>>>>> tarball of airflow repo - snapshot taken at the moment of
> >> provider's
> >>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the convenience
> >>>>>>> python "sdist" distributions that we publish in PyPI
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the convenience
> >> Python
> >>>>>>> "wheel" distributions that we publish in PyPI.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> >>> RC
> >>>>>>> is described in:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Public keys are available at:
> >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please vote accordingly:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> >> community
> >>>>> are
> >>>>>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> >>>>>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> >>>>>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/70953
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
> >>> the
> >>>>>>> RC candidates.
> >>>>>>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> >>>>>>> documentation after the
> >>>>>>> RC candidates are released.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-airbyte/6.0.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-alibaba/3.4.0rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.34.0rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-anthropic/0.2.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hdfs/4.12.2rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/9.6.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-kafka/1.15.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy/4.6.0rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/6.3.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-arangodb/2.9.6rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.23.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-clickhousedb/1.0.1rc2/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.21.0rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cohere/1.6.7rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-ai/0.7.0rc2/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-compat/1.18.0rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/2.1.0rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/7.18.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud/4.9.3rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-docker/4.5.9rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-edge3/4.3.0rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/6.9.0rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-exasol/4.10.5rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/3.8.0rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-git/0.4.2rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/22.3.0rc2/
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-hashicorp/4.8.0rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-imap/3.12.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.9.0rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/14.1.0rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-neo4j/3.12.1rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openai/1.8.2rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/2.20.0rc2/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-opensearch/1.11.2rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-papermill/3.13.2rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/7.0.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-presto/5.12.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-salesforce/5.14.2rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-sftp/6.0.1rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-smtp/3.0.3rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.16.0rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ssh/6.0.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.17.0rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-telegram/4.9.6rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-teradata/3.6.2rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/6.6.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-weaviate/3.4.1rc1/
> >>>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/4.5.1rc1/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> Jarek Potiuk
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to