I’m angry and making typos. Is _not appropriate_.


> On 26 Oct 2026, at 13:22, Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Calling a lazy consensus on this AIP given how strongly I voiced my 
> opposition to it is appropriate.
> 
> This should have never a candidate for lazy consensus, and was opened and 
> closed when many of us were busy working on the 3.4 release. There is no 
> consensus reached here.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 23 Oct 2026, at 21:52, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> The lazy consensus on AIP-120 [1] ended on 2026-10-22 12:00 UTC with
>> no objections, so AIP-120 is accepted.
>> 
>> Next steps, as described in the proposal: merge the design PR and the
>> stacked implementation PRs (everything ships switched off), run the
>> opt-in pilot, then switch it on for all external contributors in a
>> separate one-line change.
>> 
>> Reviews on the stack are very welcome: #73378, #74819, #74820, #74822,
>> #74823, #74825.
>> 
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/nfno4r1jqx5dj75v867prjjgg6o77odx
>> 
>> J.
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to