Thank, you, and I also owe you an apology as I over-reacted. However I was quite upset to find such a large change done by lazy consensus.
> On 27 Oct 2026, at 10:37, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ash, > > Separate mail with apologies. > > Yes - I was rushing because I felt pressured from several directions. We had > a really unusual accumulation of events - including the queue mounting, > release pressure and people working on many things in parallel. And the CI > and AI—for Airflow and others in ASF—has impacted literally everything we do, > and I rushed with some decisions and discussion - without realising the > effect it had. > > Yes not everyone has the same amount of time i have to follow everything. I > sometimes do not realise people do not have time to catch all the threads the > way I do - especially the threads that I am deeply involved in and know > "everything" about. > > My natural thinking—and it has always been my motivation—is how to improve > the tooling and make it more efficient. This time, I think the "CI story" > frustrated everyone, and it blinded me a bit - to the fact that others might > just not realise this is the case. > > Apologies for harsh words and for not considering your - and possibly others' > who are less direct- feelings there. The CI situation should already be in > much better shape, so I hope we can clear it up and return to "normal" also > without making such mistakes or getting blinded. > > I restarted discussions and I hope we can get positive results from them. > > Apologies again. > > J. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
