Also, I'm seeing a second issue:
SMTP doesn't seem to work for us anymore:
[2017-01-05 15:10:13,666] {models.py:1378} ERROR - SMTP AUTH extension
not supported by server.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/airflow/models.py", line
1374, in handle_failure
self.email_alert(error, is_retry=False)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/airflow/models.py", line
1521, in email_alert
send_email(task.email, title, body)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/airflow/utils/email.py", line
43, in send_email
return backend(to, subject, html_content, files=files,
dryrun=dryrun, cc=cc, bcc=bcc, mime_subtype=mime_subtype)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/airflow/utils/email.py", line
84, in send_email_smtp
send_MIME_email(SMTP_MAIL_FROM, recipients, msg, dryrun)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/airflow/utils/email.py", line
100, in send_MIME_email
s.login(SMTP_USER, SMTP_PASSWORD)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/smtplib.py", line 584, in login
raise SMTPException("SMTP AUTH extension not supported by server.")
SMTPException: SMTP AUTH extension not supported by server.
This was working on 1.7.1.2. Having a look now.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hey Robin,
>
> Awesome, thanks! I love open source. :) Let me try your patch out and
> merge it.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Miller, Robin <Robin.Miller@affiliate.
> oliverwyman.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>>
>> I think I ran into this issue when setting up LDAP Auth in our
>> environment (we're using very close to master as we needed some of the
>> newer features/bugfixes). The problem turned out to be that the search was
>> finding no results, so the line:
>>
>>
>> groups_list = [regex.search(i).group(1) for i in user_groups]
>>
>>
>> would fail because it had no matching groups to return. This turned out
>> to be because Windows Active Directory (the LDAP server we're using)
>> returned capitals "CN=" where the code expected lowercase: regex =
>> re.compile("cn=([^,]*).*")
>>
>>
>> I haven't looked it up, but Windows Active Directory is case insensitive
>> when it comes to usernames and groups, so I wouldn't be surprised if the
>> protocol itself is case insensitive and both "cn=" and "CN=" should be
>> considered valid. As such I've a PR open for a simple fix to make this
>> regex case insensitive: https://github.com/apache/incu
>> bator-airflow/pull/1945
>>
>>
>> Hopefully this helps,
>>
>> Robin Miller
>> OLIVER WYMAN
>> robin.mil...@affiliate.oliverwyman.com<mailto:robin.miller@
>> affiliate.oliverwyman.com>
>> www.oliverwyman.com<http://www.oliverwyman.com/>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
>> Sent: 05 January 2017 00:34:27
>> To: dev@airflow.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Airflow 1.8.0 alpha 2
>>
>> I am now running 1.8.0a2 in our dev environment. It seems to be
>> functioning
>> well.
>>
>> One issue we've hit is that the LDAP auth plugin isn't working for us
>> anymore:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1988, in
>> wsgi_app
>> response = self.full_dispatch_request()
>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1641, in
>> full_dispatch_request
>> rv = self.handle_user_exception(e)
>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1544, in
>> handle_user_exception
>> reraise(exc_type, exc_value, tb)
>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1639, in
>> full_dispatch_request
>> rv = self.dispatch_request()
>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1625, in
>> dispatch_request
>> return self.view_functions[rule.endpoint](**req.view_args)
>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/flask_admin/base.py", line 69,
>> in inner
>> return self._run_view(f, *args, **kwargs)
>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/flask_admin/base.py", line 368,
>> in _run_view
>> return fn(self, *args, **kwargs)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/airflow/www/views.py", line 657,
>> in login
>> return airflow.login.login(self, request)
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/airflow/contrib/auth/backe
>> nds/ldap_auth.py",
>> line 276, in login
>> flask_login.login_user(LdapUser(user))
>> File "<string>", line 4, in __init__
>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/state.py", line
>> 306, in _initialize_instance
>> manager.dispatch.init_failure(self, args, kwargs)
>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/util/langhelp
>> ers.py",
>> line 60, in __exit__
>> compat.reraise(exc_type, exc_value, exc_tb)
>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/state.py", line
>> 303, in _initialize_instance
>> return manager.original_init(*mixed[1:], **kwargs)
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/airflow/contrib/auth/backe
>> nds/ldap_auth.py",
>> line 148, in __init__
>> user.username)
>> File
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/airflow/contrib/auth/backe
>> nds/ldap_auth.py",
>> line 106, in groups_user
>> groups_list = [regex.search(i).group(1) for i in user_groups]
>> AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group'
>>
>> I believe it's from this patch:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/commit/d6d3f5367
>> 3ba3736d7a858531823933cfef2bb4e
>>
>> I haven't dug into it yet. We'll need to fix it, though. In the meantime,
>> I
>> just commented out the call to `groups_user`. More to come.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Alex Van Boxel <a...@vanboxel.be> wrote:
>>
>> > I have another fix that certainly need to be in the final release, but
>> not
>> > ready to merge due to failed tests:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/1961
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 8:48 PM Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Great, I will work toward deploying this in our dev cluster today. :D
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Some issues remain:
>> > > >
>> > > > * one_failed not executed as dag run is marked failed seemingly
>> > > > prematurely (@chris yes you should see this, see below for an
>> example
>> > > that
>> > > > is not working properly), confirmed regression
>> > > > * celery instability Alex
>> > > > * Wrong DAG state after failure inside branch
>> > > >
>> > > > So Alpha 2 is definitely not ready for production, but please do
>> put in
>> > > > your canary dags and let them run. I am still quite concerned about
>> the
>> > > > scheduler integrity and stability.
>> > > >
>> > > > - Bolke
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > one_failed_not_executed.py
>> > > > ====
>> > > > from airflow import DAG
>> > > > from airflow.operators.bash_operator import BashOperator
>> > > > from airflow.operators.dummy_operator import DummyOperator
>> > > > from datetime import datetime, timedelta
>> > > >
>> > > > default_args = {
>> > > > 'owner': 'airflow',
>> > > > 'depends_on_past': False,
>> > > > 'start_date': datetime(2016,10,5,19),
>> > > > 'email': ['airf...@airflow.com'],
>> > > > 'email_on_failure': False,
>> > > > 'email_on_retry': False,
>> > > > 'retries': 1,
>> > > > 'retry_delay': timedelta(seconds=1),
>> > > > }
>> > > >
>> > > > dag = DAG('tutorial', default_args=default_args,
>> > > schedule_interval='@once')
>> > > >
>> > > > task1 = BashOperator(
>> > > > task_id='first_one',
>> > > > bash_command='date',
>> > > > dag=dag)
>> > > >
>> > > > task2 = BashOperator(
>> > > > task_id='second_one',
>> > > > bash_command='this_should_not_work',
>> > > > dag=dag)
>> > > >
>> > > > task2.set_upstream(task1)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > task3 = BashOperator(
>> > > > task_id='third_one',
>> > > > bash_command='random_command_third',
>> > > > dag=dag)
>> > > >
>> > > > task3.set_upstream(task2)
>> > > >
>> > > > fail_task = DummyOperator(
>> > > > task_id='one_failed',
>> > > > trigger_rule='one_failed',
>> > > > dag=dag)
>> > > >
>> > > > fail_task.set_upstream([task1,task2,task3])
>> > > >
>> > > > > On 4 Jan 2017, at 20:35, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Bolke, can you describe the current state of the alpha 2 release?
>> I
>> > saw
>> > > > > some comments from Alex yesterday about celery instability. If I'm
>> > > > running
>> > > > > on LocalExecutor, should I be seeing any issues?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Hi All,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I have put up Airflow 1.8.0 alpha 2 in
>> https://people.apache.org/~
>> > > > bolke/ <
>> > > > >> https://people.apache.org/~bolke/> .
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Note: This still cannot be considered an Apache release. Working
>> on
>> > > > this.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> This build is signed (note it is served over https).
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Changes are in the area of scheduler stability.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> - Bolke
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > --
>> > _/
>> > _/ Alex Van Boxel
>> >
>>
>> ________________________________
>> This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally
>> privileged. If you received this message in error or are not the intended
>> recipient, you should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or
>> copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or
>> using any information contained herein. Please inform us of the erroneous
>> delivery by return e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation.
>>
>
>
