A PR implementing this is here https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2489
Cheers, Diogo On 30 July 2017 at 14:29, Diogo Franco <diogoalexfra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > Awesome, I also believe PythonSensor makes sense in the core package of > course. These also allow someone trying out airflow to easily build dag's > with sensors without setting up connections, for example. > > I'll open a different ticket for PythonSensor and do it separately, if > that is ok. > > Cheers. > > On 28 July 2017 at 17:46, Maxime Beauchemin <maximebeauche...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> BashSensor would be a good contribution. >> >> I'm guessing that the reason why it doesn't exist or (PythonSensor doesn't >> exist for that matter) is that it's pretty easy to derive >> BaseSensorOperator and make your own. It still would be neat to have it in >> the core package and in the docs. >> >> Max >> >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Diogo Franco <diogoalexfra...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I was looking for a sensor that allowed me to customize the sensing >> logic. >> > I couldn't find any way of doing this and wrote a BashSensor, which >> returns >> > True or False based on a command/script's return code. The >> implementation >> > is similar to the BashOperator, and it seems to me that it would fit >> pretty >> > naturally within airflow. >> > >> > Is there another way to achieve this that I don't know about? If you >> think >> > it is worthwhile, I'm happy to work on some tests and a PR. >> > >> > Thank you! >> > >> > >
