I believe so, yes.

I will proceed with release. :)

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> But it doesn’t stop us from releasing now right? You can just update the
> tag. It is not connected to the artifacts.
>
> Bolke.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2889
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sigh. There's a catch 22 here. If we tag an RC as 1.9.0, we'll have to
> >> keep editing the tag every time there's a new RC. I agree that removing
> the
> >> check seems like the best course of action.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is just matter of setting the tag in the repo right?
> >>>
> >>> We should remove that check or make it not fail at least. It is
> >>> ridiculous.
> >>>
> >>> B.
> >>>
> >>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> >>>
> >>>> Op 17 dec. 2017 om 07:32 heeft Joy Gao <j...@wepay.com> het volgende
> >>> geschreven:
> >>>>
> >>>> Ahh, tested the build on a fresh virtualenv, which succeeded *the
> first
> >>>> time* given gitpython was not installed and it skipped the assertion
> >>> check
> >>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
> >>> setup.py#L68-L73>.
> >>>> Build fails on re-installs :(
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Feng Lu <fen...@google.com.invalid>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +0.5 (non-binding)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Looks like the version(1.9.0) and tag(1.9.0rc8) is mismatched,
> >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
> >>> setup.py#L87>
> >>>>> which will cause the installation (pip install or python setup) to
> >>> error
> >>>>> out and fail.
> >>>>> nit: mind also updating the release log "
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/1.9.0rc8/
> >>> CHANGELOG.txt"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
> >>> <fo...@driesprong.frl>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 binding
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Op vr 15 dec. 2017 om 23:39 schreef Bolke de Bruin <
> bdbr...@gmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1, binding
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Checked sigs, version, source is there (did not check build), bin
> is
> >>>>>> there.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Bolke
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Op 15 dec. 2017 om 23:31 heeft Joy Gao <j...@wepay.com> het
> >>> volgende
> >>>>>>> geschreven:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1, binding
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thank you Chris!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Chris Riccomini <
> >>>>>> criccom...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hey all,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> (Last time, I hope)^2
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have cut Airflow 1.9.0 RC8. This email is calling a vote on the
> >>>>>>> release,
> >>>>>>>>> which will last for 72 hours. Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Airflow 1.9.0 RC8 is available at:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/airflow/1.
> 9.0rc8/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-source.tar.gz is a source
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>> comes with INSTALL instructions.
> >>>>>>>>> apache-airflow-1.9.0rc8+incubating-bin.tar.gz is the binary
> Python
> >>>>>>> "sdist"
> >>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Public keys are available at:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/airflow/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The release contains no new JIRAs. Just a version fix.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I also had to change the version number to exclude the `rc6`
> string
> >>>>> as
> >>>>>>> well
> >>>>>>>>> as the "+incubating" string, so it's now simply 1.9.0. This will
> >>>>> allow
> >>>>>>> us
> >>>>>>>>> to rename the artifact without modifying the artifact checksums
> >>> when
> >>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>> actually release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> See JIRAs that were in 1.9.0RC7 and before (see previous VOTE
> email
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>> full list).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>> Chris
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to