The following concern Masatake mentioned before is an important point,
so I talked to Brahma for clarifying his intention on the ASF Slack
yesterday.

> Multiple versions of the same package (deb/rpm) can not be installed at the 
> same time.
> IIRC, HDP uses convention in which the product version is part of package name
> for addressing this.

> I don't like to bring the awkward package name convention to Bigtop
> at least by default.

He's planning to adopt the same mitigation as HDP for now, but he
doesn't intend to change the default package naming convention of
Bigtop,
but just add a new functionality to include an extra part into the
package name for avoiding conflict, which is disabled by default.

And Brahma, let me confirm about the following reply:

> Sure, we can have module name like bigtop-distro-select.

Do you mean that you're going to name the module (same as "component"
in the Bigtop terminology, I think) bigtop-distro-select,
and still the script in question bdp-select? If so, is there any
reason that the script must be that name?
(No offence, I just want to understand your thoughts and its
background, and avoid the conflict or user's confusion with existing
trademarks or products)

Kengo Seki <sek...@apache.org>

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:08 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy
<bbatt...@visa.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> >   The name of stack based no Bigtop should be Bigtop.
>   >   If you can not accept the name like bigtop-*, the work should done 
> outside of Bigtop.
>   >  I will cast -1 if someone submit a patch to add a module with the name 
> spoiling branding.
>
> Sure, we can have module name like  bigtop-distro-select.
> Initially we'll do this separate branch.
>
>
>
> On 06/07/22, 8:55 AM, "Masatake Iwasaki" <iwasak...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
>
>     > I believe it's for project name. isn't it.?
>
>     projects and products.
>
>     > IMO, We need to create folders and refer stacknames so 
> ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good.
>
>     The name of stack based no Bigtop should be Bigtop.
>     If you can not accept the name like bigtop-*, the work should done 
> outside of Bigtop.
>     I will cast -1 if someone submit a patch to add a module with the name 
> spoiling branding.
>
>
>     On 2022/07/06 11:44, Battula, Brahma Reddy wrote:
>     >
>     > I believe it's for project name. isn't it.?
>     >
>     >
>     > On 06/07/22, 7:27 AM, "Masatake Iwasaki" <iwasak...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> 
> wrote:
>     >
>     >      > But As we are not releasing as enterprise should be fine I 
> think. IMO, We need to create folders and refer stacknames so 
> ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good.
>     >
>     >      Not fine.
>     >      We have a trademark policy.
>     >      
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Ffoundation%2Fmarks%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7Cc35272ff938645e034f908da5eff1bcc%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637926747017162847%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=gDhqEuyGhsdvPKcxrA65I4G9BRD86Ai%2BoasW0ycTfng%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >
>     >      On 2022/07/06 10:37, Battula, Brahma Reddy wrote:
>     >      >> Should we avoid unrecognized brand which may be trademark of 
> someone?
>     >      >> ambari-select or bigtop-select should be enough.
>     >      >
>     >      > Not sure, where to confirm whether there is already trademark. 
> When I googled found so many.
>     >      > But As we are not releasing as enterprise should be fine I 
> think. IMO, We need to create folders and refer stacknames so 
> ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good.
>     >      > May be you can refer the initial proposal [2] where I mentioned 
> some more names. (BDS-BigDataStack,OSS-OpenSourceSelect..)
>     >      >
>     >      > Finally thanks a bunch for long healthy discussions on this. 
> Mostly we all same page now.
>     >      >
>     >      > 1. 
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dbdp%26safe%3Dactive%26sxsrf%3DALiCzsaQDcQS0gb8KbAMfjadXuG-jomxRQ%253A1657070844287%26ei%3D_OTEYsuWEYrD4-EPp4uKqAE%26ved%3D0ahUKEwjLhKr4jeP4AhWK4TgGHaeFAhUQ4dUDCA4%26uact%3D5%26oq%3Dbdp%26gs_lcp%3DCgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBAgjECcyBAgjECcyCggAELEDEIMBEEMyCwgAEIAEELEDEIMBMgsIABCABBCxAxCDATIRCC4QgAQQsQMQgwEQxwEQ0QMyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEOgcIABBHELADOgYIABAeEBY6CggAEB4QDxAWEAo6CggAEIAEEIcCEBQ6CwguEIAEEMcBEK8BOgcIABCABBAKOhYILhCABBCHAhCxAxCDARDHARDRAxAUSgQIQRgASgQIRhgAUKsHWNgRYLoWaAFwAXgAgAGoAYgBtAeSAQMwLjiYAQCgAQHIAQjAAQE%26sclient%3Dgws-wiz&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7Cc35272ff938645e034f908da5eff1bcc%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637926747017162847%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=ZFYaWY1a45yniMuLQaZjKVQGt9kE5elMrLNh8Cm9HL4%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >      >
>     >      > 2. 
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fm77lhzo0njr2dhoock5twtm0c19j2py8&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7Cc35272ff938645e034f908da5eff1bcc%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637926747017162847%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=3awZ5TFt9AyItE5CkLBLSANkjX4KIr%2FqCrdDirKEBew%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >      >
>     >      >
>     >      > On 06/07/22, 4:01 AM, "Masatake Iwasaki" 
> <iwasak...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
>     >      >
>     >      >      > We have still not officially finalized the new 
> replacement name for
>     >      >      > hdp-select, it would likely be bdp-select (bdp: BigData 
> Platform). However,
>     >      >      > the purpose of bdp-select and conf-select remains the 
> same.
>     >      >
>     >      >      Should we avoid unrecognized brand which may be trademark 
> of someone?
>     >      >      ambari-select or bigtop-select should be enough.
>     >      >
>     >      >      On 2022/06/29 13:52, Viraj Jasani wrote:
>     >      >      > Hi Ambari/Bigtop dev,
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > As per the new roadmap of Apache Ambari, we would like to 
> propose moving
>     >      >      > certain scripts (previously known as hdp-select and 
> conf-select) to Bigtop
>     >      >      > so that their rpm installation could be managed 
> independently.
>     >      >      > These scripts are a basic necessity in the Ambari 
> framework for the
>     >      >      > installation of various Bigdata packages. The only major 
> changes they would
>     >      >      > receive is when we onboard new services and components to 
> Ambari, else they
>     >      >      > usually do not receive updates. In the past, we used to 
> get hdp-select rpm
>     >      >      > downloaded and installed from HDP repositories.
>     >      >      >
>     >      >      > We have still not officially finalized the new 
> replacement name for
>     >      >      > hdp-select, it would likely be bdp-select (bdp: BigData 
> Platform). However,
>     >      >      > the purpose of bdp-select and conf-select remains the 
> same.
>     >      >      >
>     >      >
>     >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ambari.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ambari.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ambari.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ambari.apache.org

Reply via email to