Herr Periyaswamy: I believe the procedure is you would have to gain approval of at least one of the commiters (There is also the question of who would maintain it for the next version of PVCS) In any case could you repost the code for all to see. Vielen Danke, Martin
Gesellschaftlich ist kaum etwas so erfolgreich wie Dummheit mit guten Manieren. Voltaire ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:28 PM Subject: RE: enhanced pvcs task for PVCS version 7.5 > > <Steven > > I'd be interested in it, although I am a firm believer in maintaining > compatibility with old-style get. > </Steven > > I agree. Please take a look at the source, I attached to the other reply, > but that is in no way complete. I just wanted it to work for our PVCS vm > version. As you have mentioned, it could be modified to be in compatible > with older versions. > > Chandra Periyaswamy > > > > > "Steven Newton" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > .com> cc: > Subject: RE: enhanced pvcs task for PVCS version 7.5 > 03/11/2003 05:08 > PM > Please respond to > "Ant Developers > List" > > > > > > > I'd be interested in it, although I am a firm believer in maintaining > compatibility with old-style get. A question for the Ant Powers That > Be: > What's the recommended way to do this sort of migration? Create a new > task that's similar to the old but includes the enhancements, or add > options to the new task that default to the old behavior? What about if > the change can not be backwards-compatible -- would that favor the > creation of a new "enhanced" task? I'm thinking here of the issues > around http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13847. > > s > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 12:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: enhanced pvcs task for PVCS version 7.5 > > > Hi, > > I'm a greenhorn to this list, so please pardon my mistakes if any. > > I modified the pvcs task to work with PVCS VM version 7.5. Instead of a > old > "get", I use "pcli get" in this modified version. It has been tested and > used in my project. I have tested on sun OS. I would be glad to submit > the > source, if you'd like. Please let me know what you think. > > I also think keeping the support for the old "get" may also seem > important > for the community. > > > :o) Chandra Periyaswamy > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
