Dominique Devienne wrote, On 14/03/2003 15.50:
I actually signed off <lsync>, not <subant>, technically, but in practice I give both. Anything I submit to BugZilla is good for the taking, and I'll refrain to include my usual/automatic copyright notice in the future.
Yees! lsync is koooool :-)
Sorry to hear you suppressed passing down the current target name... That one of the feature of that task I won't live without. But that's OK, I'll keep using my own task then (actually I would anyhow for the dependency ordering I have).
Centipede does it using the Gump project descriptor. Could it be a wise thing to stick to one version of the two only, or does it make sense to have this anyway? (just asking)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------