Christopher Lenz wrote:Same here. Proposed interface:
public class DynamicConfiguratorNS {
public Object createDynamicElement( String namespaceURI, String prefix, String localName);
public void setDynamicAttribute( String namespaceURI, String prefix, String localName, String value);
}
We could instead use SAX style: public class DynamicConfiguratorNS {
public Object createDynamicElement( String namespaceURI, String localName, String qualifiedName);
public void setDynamicAttribute( String namespaceURI, String localName, String qualifiedName, String value);
Personally, I prefer DOM style as it is higher-level. The qualifiedName parameter makes sense (well, sort of) when you can enable/disable namespace support. When namespace support is always enabled (as it is in Ant 1.6) the (namespaceURI, prefix, localName) partitioning makes more sense IMHO, and is easier to use.
However, I really think we should pass a NamespaceContext (working title) instead of the prefix, as explained in another post in this thread.
Cheers, Chris
-- Christopher Lenz /=/ cmlenz at gmx.de
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
