On Thu, 08 Jan 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I propose that utils.XmlFragment is moved to typedefs and made to extend Datatype;
Why do you want it to extend DataType at all?
hey this is cool, now that I am almost in europe, stefan can comment on my ideas before waste time implementing them.
I want to do referencing so that you could go
<xmlfragment refid="payload" xmlns:f="something"> <f:foo>some XML here</f:foo/> </xmlfragment>
And then later use it
<SoapPost> <body refid="payload"/> </SoapPost>
Of course the namespaces need to be resolved relative to the context at time of declaration, not use.
This should not break anything *Except* the .net stuff in the sandbox...
Don't worry about that. It will have to change to adapt to whatever we'll invent as a namespace aware replacement for DynamicConfigurator anyway.
Stefan
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
