Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I've looked into the code (gosh, I still remember part of it :-) The following path is OTOMH, without even compiling, it should be a start.
Implementing this is not the issue...
I know, I haven't replied to /your/ mail, but Stefan's original one.
In any case, the reason is simple: sometimes it happens that I want to rely on *that* *particular* task in *that* imported buildfile, no matter what happens in the future.
Imagine that I depend from an "init" task in an imported buildfile... I would depend on it in many targets. Now, imagine, and it's not that far fetched, that I have another init target that is imported or defined, and that I have to recheck all the places where I have declared my dependency...
It all boils down to what you want to call.
Personally I prefer to *declare* what I want, not go check later that an extra target breaks my initial intentions (that are surely forgotten by that time).
Is it clear now?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
