Sounds great. Do you have also "Movable" interface? - Alexey.
On 5/23/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- "Alexey N. Solofnenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Can it be - copy+delete in that case? > > Okay... here's what I did for preserving timestamps in > FileUtils copy methods. I added a Touchable interface > to the resources package. FileResource is (so far) > the only Resource that uses it, but I was thinking > along the lines of FTP/SCP Resources when I added it. > So by that token, you would similarly add a Deletable > (?) interface for FileResource to implement. So then > move could fail when encountering a Resource that does > not implement Deletable... that is the only sensible > way that occurs to me to support Resource deletion. > > -Matt > > > > > - Alexey. > > > > Matt Benson wrote: > > > > >... Regarding the Move task, I don't see that we > > could > > >move non-file resources in a predictable way so I > > >would recommend failing on ResourceCollections that > > do > > >not return true from isFilesystemOnly(). > > > > > >Thoughts? > > > > > >-Matt > -- Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com <http://gmail.com> home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually)
