--- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds great. Do you have also "Movable" interface?
Not yet. Let's see if anyone else has anything to say about these concepts too. -Matt > > - Alexey. > > On 5/23/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- "Alexey N. Solofnenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Can it be - copy+delete in that case? > > > > Okay... here's what I did for preserving > timestamps in > > FileUtils copy methods. I added a Touchable > interface > > to the resources package. FileResource is (so far) > > the only Resource that uses it, but I was thinking > > along the lines of FTP/SCP Resources when I added > it. > > So by that token, you would similarly add a > Deletable > > (?) interface for FileResource to implement. So > then > > move could fail when encountering a Resource that > does > > not implement Deletable... that is the only > sensible > > way that occurs to me to support Resource > deletion. > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > - Alexey. > > > > > > Matt Benson wrote: > > > > > > >... Regarding the Move task, I don't see that > we > > > could > > > >move non-file resources in a predictable way so > I > > > >would recommend failing on ResourceCollections > that > > > do > > > >not return true from isFilesystemOnly(). > > > > > > > >Thoughts? > > > > > > > >-Matt > > > > > -- > Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com > <http://gmail.com> > home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ > Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually) > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]