--- Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds great. Do you have also "Movable" interface?

Not yet.  Let's see if anyone else has anything to say
about these concepts too.

-Matt
> 
> - Alexey.
> 
> On 5/23/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > 
> > --- "Alexey N. Solofnenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Can it be - copy+delete in that case?
> > 
> > Okay... here's what I did for preserving
> timestamps in
> > FileUtils copy methods. I added a Touchable
> interface
> > to the resources package. FileResource is (so far)
> > the only Resource that uses it, but I was thinking
> > along the lines of FTP/SCP Resources when I added
> it.
> > So by that token, you would similarly add a
> Deletable
> > (?) interface for FileResource to implement. So
> then
> > move could fail when encountering a Resource that
> does
> > not implement Deletable... that is the only
> sensible
> > way that occurs to me to support Resource
> deletion.
> > 
> > -Matt
> > 
> > >
> > > - Alexey.
> > >
> > > Matt Benson wrote:
> > >
> > > >... Regarding the Move task, I don't see that
> we
> > > could
> > > >move non-file resources in a predictable way so
> I
> > > >would recommend failing on ResourceCollections
> that
> > > do
> > > >not return true from isFilesystemOnly().
> > > >
> > > >Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > >-Matt
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com
> <http://gmail.com>
> home: http://trelony.cjb.net/
> Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually)
> 


                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to