--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I also would prefer to wait a bit to create the > ANT_17_BRANCH. > > For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like > maybe splitting the source tree per jar. > Documentation could also be split by theme such as > property tasks, resource based tasks, SCM tasks > rather than the current distinction core/optional > which is not so nice.
While we're on the subject, note that in Java6, <script> is no longer an optional task. ;) -Matt > > If such refactoring happens, merging changes between > two source trees which look different is a pain. > > Regards, > > Antoine > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:05:12 +0100 > Von: Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: Branch > > > Matt Benson schreef: > > > --- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH? > > >> > > > > > > Not that I know of. We did pretty well > restraining > > > ourselves from committing to HEAD just before > the > > > release. :) Should we wait on branching until > nearer > > > to 1.7.1, or until we know we want to put > something in > > > that should be for 1.8? > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > I think we should create a branch as soon as the > 1.7 "version series" > > stabilizes. (and only make things public that > should be in 1.8 after the > > 1.7 series has become oficially stable) > > > > Martijn > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
