Why not using the same logic that we have with ant -p and ant -p -v.? We could have ant -v -version and ant -v -diagnostics.
2008/8/19 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Jeffrey E. Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/18/2008 10:52:50 AM: >> >>> > I've been thinking about ways that installed antlibs could >>> > contribute diagnostic modules and version information. Is there >>> > anything like this in the works already that I've missed? >>> >>> I don't thinks so, but I agree that it would be a good idea. >> >> Assuming other committers agree, > > We might see. > >> what are your thoughts on the behavior of the existing -version & >> -diagnostics switches? For best backward compatibility we'd have to >> leave the existing switches as-is & add new switches to show info >> from the antlibs, though that may be overkill in this situation. > > I wouldn't expect anybody to rely on the exact output of either, but > I'd love to keep -version as short as it is right now and add a new > switch here, while I'd be happy to just add more output to > -diagnostics.. > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Gilles Scokart --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
