Hi,
I saw the FAQ, but the workaround deals with making a new property, which is
not something that is desirable in my situation.
Is there a reason that double expanding is not implemented?
Cheers,
Remie
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:53 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Is it possible to resolve a property name like this
> >
> >${${prefix}.someproperty}
> >
> >making the prefix variable?
>
>
> see
> http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#propertyvalue-as-name-for-property
>
>
> Jan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
