-0 on the concept; my preference would be to let the function prove it's usefulness in EasyAnt & move it into core later if it truly proves useful
-1 on the "phase" name +1 on using "target-group" for the name ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Jeffrey E. (Jeff) Care [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM WebSphere Application Server WAS Release Engineering From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: dev@ant.apache.org Date: 11/11/2008 06:26 AM Subject: EasyAnt phases Hi all, EasyAnt has a concept named "phase" which is some special sort of target. The main differences: * is always empty * its depends list is open for other targets to modify, i.e. targets may add themselves as dependencies to a phase. It has been suggested to rename "phase" to "target-group". Without going into implementation details, do we want to add the concept itself to Ant's core? If we don't I'll volunteer to help the EasyAnt people to hook the concept into Ant without patching Ant itself. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
