I must correct myself again... the short names are there, too, and one may use getLocation() to get rid of the doubles/correct getDependencies(). Still, the inconsistency remains...
Gintas 2013/9/30 Gintautas Grigelionis <g.grigelio...@gmail.com> > Sorry for double post, my description of the problem is incorrect. The > middle paragraph should read: > > Now getName() of a Target returns the original name prepended by the name > of the *imported* project (the same as corresponding key in getTargets() > in a Project), *but* getProject() returns the top project name, so there > is no way to find out what the original name is. Neither is there a simple > way to correct the dependency names. > > Gintas > > > 2013/9/30 Gintautas Grigelionis <g.grigelio...@gmail.com> > >> I have noticed (belatedly) a change in Ant API, namely, that there >> seems to be no way to find out >> what the original target names in an imported project are. Previously, >> original names were returned by >> getName() in a corresponding Target, which was consistent with >> getDependencies(). >> >> Now getName() returns the original name prepended by the top project >> name, the same as >> corresponding key in getTargets() in a Project, and getProject() >> returns the top project name, >> so there is no way to find out what the original name is. >> >> It should be considered a bug: either getName(), getProject() or >> getDependencies() must be fixed >> so that the information is consistent: either "fully qualified" names >> are used everywhere, or else >> there should be a way to obtain the original target names (which I >> would prefer). >> >> Gintas >> > >
