I also notice that the documentation relies heavily on seemingly proprietary bits from datatorrent.
Is there a plan in place to update the docs so users can follow them purely with ASF software? I don't like the idea of having a dependency on proprietary software in order to learn how to use ASF software. -Taylor > On Jan 27, 2016, at 6:14 PM, Sasha Parfenov <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm working on migrating Apex-specific documentation to an ASF repository. > Current plan is to add it under > https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core in docs/, and host > documentation on http://apex.incubator.apache.org/ or readthedocs.org. If > anybody has additional suggestion, please provide your feedback. > > In terms of IP clearance, DataTorrent team, including Thomas and myself > will review the docs, and ensure every document migrated complies with ASF > standards and is under Apache 2.0 license, like the rest of the apex-core > repository. > > Thanks, > Sasha > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Taylor, >> >> The source for the site is here: >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-site >> >> The documentation will be moved to the Apex repository within the next few >> weeks: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-293 >> >> Thanks, >> Thomas >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> It looks like the majority of the project documentation is still hosted >> on >>> DataTorrent’s website, not ASF infrastructure. Are there any plans to >> move >>> it? Which brings up the question as to whether Datatorrent owns the >>> documentation (i.e. moving it to Apache Apex might require IP clearance). >>> >>> I also couldn't find the source code for the Apex website. Where is that >>> located? >>> >>> -Taylor >>> >>>> On Jan 25, 2016, at 8:49 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> I think it's reasonable to discuss graduation at this point. >>>> >>>> There are a few items on the podling status page that should be closed >>> out, but it looks like most of them are complete and are simply missing >>> dates. >>>> >>>> I like Justin's suggestion of testing out the maturity model. Not a >>> requirement, but it'd be interesting to see various viewpoints on where >>> Apex stands in relation. >>>> >>>> I'll try to supply some feedback soon. >>>> >>>> -Taylor >>>> >>>>> On Jan 25, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear Apex community, >>>>> >>>>> This is to initiate the discussion about graduation of Apache Apex to >>> top >>>>> level project (TLP). Apex entered incubation ~6 months ago in August. >>>>> >>>>> Since then we have seen steady growth in interest in the project based >>> on >>>>> email list participation and meetups. >>>>> >>>>> We have released 3 times (1 Core, 2 Malhar) with another core RC just >>>>> around the corner. >>>>> >>>>> We have seen new contributors (including some from other Apache >>>>> communities). We added new committers and PPMC members and increased >>>>> diversity. >>>>> >>>>> It would be great to hear your what the community overall thinks about >>>>> graduating and what the mentors take on it is? >>>>> >>>>> Looking forward to your feedback. See below documents to guide the >>>>> discussion. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Thomas >>>>> >>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html >>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html >>
