[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15212710#comment-15212710
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-10:
----------------------------------------
Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/250#discussion_r57506947
--- Diff: api/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/api/DAG.java ---
@@ -250,6 +250,24 @@
public abstract <T> void setAttribute(Operator operator, Attribute<T>
key, T value);
/**
+ * Set affinity between operators
+ * @param locality
+ * @param relaxLocality
+ * @param first operator
+ * @param one or more operators
+ */
+ public abstract void setAffinity(Locality locality, boolean
relaxLocality, String firstOperator, String... operators);
--- End diff --
I see. IMO we should not bloat the core API with convenience or helper
methods.
> Enable non-affinity of operators per node (not containers)
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: APEXCORE-10
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-10
> Project: Apache Apex Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Amol Kekre
> Assignee: Isha Arkatkar
> Labels: roadmap
>
> The issue happens on cloud which provides virtual cores with software like
> Xen underneath. In effect if CPU intensive operators land up on same node we
> have a resource bottleneck,
> Need to create an attribute that does the following
> - Operators A & B should not be on same node
> - Stram should use this attribute to try to get containers on different node
> It is understood that the user is making an explicit choice to use NIC
> instead of stream local optimization
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
