Just wanted to know why, I have no preference. On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> We treated com.datatorrent in a special way earlier which is why I started > the discussion. > If we don't want to have anything special for org.apache.apex then there > will not be any change. > > Chandni > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Why do we need something special for org.apache.apex ? > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 for Ram's suggestion :-) > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Munagala Ramanath <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'd suggest keeping all the org.apache imports together and in > > > > lexicographic order. > > > > > > > > Ram > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Chandni Singh < > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > We need to include org.apache.apex in the import order that we have > > > right > > > > > now: > > > > > > > > > > *Current order:* > > > > > java > > > > > javax > > > > > org > > > > > org.apache > > > > > io > > > > > com > > > > > com.datatorrent > > > > > * > > > > > all static imports > > > > > > > > > > *Proposed order:* > > > > > java > > > > > javax > > > > > org > > > > > org.apache > > > > > io > > > > > com > > > > > com.datatorrent > > > > > org.apache.apex > > > > > * > > > > > all static imports > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Chandni > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
