Hi Ray, > It is not a limitation. It is more about design choice. Losing > "all-in-one-file" package convenience (for maintenance on user side), > and losing OO Base GUI (for occasional manual admin.). There is not > much value left to keep OO Base in the integration list. So OO Base > is effectively out of the integration list if HSQLDB is run in > standalone server mode, just like any other JDBC RDBMS.
Yes, this unfortunately might be the consequence. > This is an interesting revelation. Do you imply that it is possible > in OO 2.2.0 to transport the java.sql.Connection object in the same > JVM? No, as far as I understood Stephan in the thread were we first discussed this, it currently isn't. If not technical (what I cannot judge), then by the fact of current implementations. What I wanted to say is that such a feature - transport the Java object via UNO - is (probably) impossible when it comes to two JVMs, at the latest. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
