Thank you very much ZhengSong Tu ~

I understand how to do it.

ZhengSong Tu <tzssanggl...@gmail.com> 于2021年7月30日周五 下午2:09写道:

>  SSL [2] points to an attribute of stream_route,  the list of matching
> attributes is:
> https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/admin-api#request-body-parameters-9
>
> Baoyuan <baoyuan....@gmail.com> 于2021年7月30日周五 下午12:48写道:
>
> > Hi, community,
> >
> > When I was solving this issue[1], I encountered a problem:
> >
> > There is a change parameter named sni  in the SSL [2] , but I did not
> find
> > information about this field in the admin api of APISIX [3].
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/issues/2015
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/pull/1999/files#diff-5fadf7c6b5b550d0a97075c3ddeaf29028204cd60da2660c6a1e1c72b4bbd0edR1438
> > [3]
> >
> https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/admin-api#request-body-parameters-4
> >
> > Best Regards!
> >
> > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年7月29日周四 下午9:45写道:
> >
> > > Hi, Baoyuan,
> > >
> > > Thanks to take this issue, and don't forget to link it to
> > > https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/issues/1944 , so we could
> > have
> > > a
> > > track.
> > >
> > > Best Regards!
> > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > >
> > >
> > > Baoyuan <baoyuan....@gmail.com> 于2021年7月29日周四 下午6:07写道:
> > >
> > > > Hi, community,
> > > >
> > > > I can help solve this issue[1] in the 2.7.1 Milestone.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/issues/2015
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards!
> > > >
> > > > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年7月29日周四 下午5:59写道:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, community,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just created the 2.7.1 Milestone and added the necessary issues
> > > > here[1],
> > > > > and looking forward to having contributors working on them :)
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/milestone/14
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards!
> > > > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年7月27日周二 上午11:52写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi, community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > After having a diff between Dashboard 2.7 and APISIX 2.7, I list
> > all
> > > > the
> > > > > > differences across modules.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Phase 1: Dashboard 2.7.1 with APISIX 2.7
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Module Differences
> > > > > > Other Remove Version Matcher Logics on both Web and ManagerAPI
> > > > > > Upstream Check hash_on filed and limitation
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/2.7/admin-api#request-body-parameters-3
> > > > > > Route Support uri/uris、host/hosts、remote_addr/remote_addrs
> > > > > > Route Support all operators in the "vars" field (like APISIX
> does)
> > > > > > Plugin Diff schema.json
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/pull/1999/files
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Phase2: Dashboard 2.7.2 with APISIX 2.7
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Upstream Support Service Discovery: Nacos、Eureka、Consul、DNS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/2.7/discovery/nacos
> > > > > > Upstream Support FQDN
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/2.7/FAQ#does-the-upstream-node-support-configuring-the-fqdn-address
> > > > > > Stream Route Support Stream Proxy (Stream Route)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/2.7/stream-proxy
> > > > > > <https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/2.7/stream-proxy>
> > > > > > -
> https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/2.7/admin-api#stream-route
> > > > > > <
> https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/2.7/admin-api#stream-route>
> > > > > > SSL Support all fields in the SSL entity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/2.7/admin-api/#ssl
> > > > > > Plugin Metadata What're the cases for Plugin Metadata
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/2.7/admin-api/#plugin-metadata
> > > > > > Phase 3: Dashboard 2.8 with APISIX 2.8
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Due to APISIX 2.8 has changes that Dashboard isn't supported, I
> > don't
> > > > > have
> > > > > > a detailed diff between them. Let's do the first 2 phases :) I
> will
> > > > > create
> > > > > > 2 milestones later.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any thoughts on this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards!
> > > > > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Peter Zhu <sta...@apache.org> 于2021年7月26日周一 上午10:23写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Agree + 1. I'm looking forward to the long-term solution.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> JunXu Chen <chenju...@apache.org> 于2021年7月26日周一 上午9:17写道:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Agree + 1, especially with the Long-term solution.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > The Manager API did not bring many features but caused many
> > > problems
> > > > > >> due to
> > > > > >> > the synchronization of the JSON Schema.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 00:44, Xiran Liu <liuxi...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Agree, and looking forward to the long term solution, we
> need
> > a
> > > > > >> unified
> > > > > >> > > API to operate APISIX, and for dashboard, we only need some
> > data
> > > > > >> > conversion
> > > > > >> > > from service.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On 2021/07/25 09:37:58, Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > Hi, community,
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > After this discussion is closed, I will create 2
> milestones
> > to
> > > > > track
> > > > > >> > > > progress:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > - Keep the current functionally compatible with Apache
> > APISIX
> > > > 2.7
> > > > > ->
> > > > > >> > > 2.7.1
> > > > > >> > > > - Support the functionality with Apache APISIX 2.8 -> 2.8
> > > > (Apache
> > > > > >> > APISIX
> > > > > >> > > > 2.8 is coming soon)
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Best Regards!
> > > > > >> > > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年7月25日周日 下午3:39写道:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Hi, Shyamal,
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > Any changes to existing APIs should be visible to
> > > Dashboard
> > > > > team
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > That's true, and due to the Dashboard is beyond the
> > APISIX,
> > > I
> > > > > >> would
> > > > > >> > > prefer
> > > > > >> > > > > supporting the current APISIX's functionally in the
> > > Dashboard,
> > > > > >> then
> > > > > >> > > > > continuing watching on the status of APISIX, then we
> could
> > > > > update
> > > > > >> it
> > > > > >> > as
> > > > > >> > > > > soon as possible :)
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Do there have any other questions? If no, I'm glad to
> lead
> > > > this
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >> > > take
> > > > > >> > > > > action next week.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Best Regards!
> > > > > >> > > > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Shyamal Madura Chinthaka <shyamal.mad...@gmail.com>
> > > > > 于2021年7月23日周五
> > > > > >> > > > > 上午4:19写道:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> Hi Zhiyuan Ju et al,
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> Adding my 2 cents especially on the long term solution,
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> I believe Dashboard should rely on more stable long
> term
> > > > > >> supported
> > > > > >> > > APIs
> > > > > >> > > > >> from APISIX. API changes should be version and old
> > version
> > > > > >> should be
> > > > > >> > > > >> deprecated with support for a fair amount of time.
> > > > > >> > > > >> Any changes to existing APIs should be visible to
> > Dashboard
> > > > > team
> > > > > >> in
> > > > > >> > > > >> advanced so that Dashboard team can adopt API changes
> > > > > relatively
> > > > > >> > fast
> > > > > >> > > > >> without delaying until the APISIX release is done.
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> However problem should be discussed beyond the
> dashboard
> > > and
> > > > > >> > possible
> > > > > >> > > > >> compatibility issues with APISIX new changes.
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> APISIX may have been integrated with other platforms
> for
> > > > > >> automation
> > > > > >> > > for
> > > > > >> > > > >> things like microservice / low code development
> platforms
> > > > > (which
> > > > > >> I
> > > > > >> > > work
> > > > > >> > > > >> with as well) thus immediate incompatibility with any
> API
> > > > could
> > > > > >> run
> > > > > >> > > into
> > > > > >> > > > >> obvious issues with other kinds of integration.
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> Much Regards,
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> Shyamal Madura!
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021, 22:06 Zhiyuan Ju <
> > > juzhiy...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Hi,
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > After rethinking this issue, I have the following
> > > proposal:
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > In the current architecture where DP and CP are
> > > separated,
> > > > > each
> > > > > >> > > party
> > > > > >> > > > >> needs
> > > > > >> > > > >> > to maintain JSONSchema data. Moreover, when APISIX is
> > > > > upgraded
> > > > > >> > (API
> > > > > >> > > > >> field
> > > > > >> > > > >> > additions and deletions, plugins and their field
> > > additions
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> > > > >> deletions),
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Dashboard also needs to finish adapting and releasing
> > new
> > > > > >> versions
> > > > > >> > > as
> > > > > >> > > > >> soon
> > > > > >> > > > >> > as possible, otherwise using a mismatched Dashboard
> > will
> > > > > write
> > > > > >> > data
> > > > > >> > > in
> > > > > >> > > > >> ETCD
> > > > > >> > > > >> > that APISIX may not support and create new problems.
> > > > > Therefore,
> > > > > >> > > global
> > > > > >> > > > >> > hinting in Dashboard is not desirable and does not
> > solve
> > > > the
> > > > > >> > > fundamental
> > > > > >> > > > >> > problem.
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > To solve the problem of Dashboard and APISIX
> > adaptation,
> > > > the
> > > > > >> > > following
> > > > > >> > > > >> plan
> > > > > >> > > > >> > is adopted, divided into 3 phases.
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > **Phase 1**
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > The first phase requires a quick solution to the
> > problem
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> > > > >> following
> > > > > >> > > > >> > way.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > 1. Now, the latest version of Dashboard is 2.7, and
> the
> > > > > latest
> > > > > >> > > version
> > > > > >> > > > >> of
> > > > > >> > > > >> > APISIX is 2.7.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > 2. Disregard the historical version matching problem
> > and
> > > > > >> deprecate
> > > > > >> > > the
> > > > > >> > > > >> > version matching logic (manually maintaining a
> Mapper).
> > > > > >> > > > >> > 3. Compare Dashboard 2.7 with APISIX 2.7 and sort out
> > > where
> > > > > >> > > Dashboard's
> > > > > >> > > > >> > existing features are inconsistent with APISIX (API
> > > fields,
> > > > > >> plugin
> > > > > >> > > > >> schema).
> > > > > >> > > > >> > 4. Update Dashboard to match the existing features
> with
> > > > > APISIX
> > > > > >> 2.7
> > > > > >> > > and
> > > > > >> > > > >> > release version 2.7.1.
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > **Phase 2**
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > The second phase requires enriching Dashboard
> > > functionality
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> > match
> > > > > >> > > > >> APISIX
> > > > > >> > > > >> > functionality.
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > 1. Sort out which APISIX 2.7 features are not
> > implemented
> > > > in
> > > > > >> > > Dashboard
> > > > > >> > > > >> > 2.7.1, such as Stream Proxy, Service Discovery, etc.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > 2. Update the Dashboard to include the existing
> > features
> > > of
> > > > > >> APISIX
> > > > > >> > > 2.7
> > > > > >> > > > >> and
> > > > > >> > > > >> > release version 2.7.2.
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > **Phase 3**
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Phase 3 requires the Dashboard to synchronize the
> > APISIX
> > > > > >> release
> > > > > >> > > > >> schedule
> > > > > >> > > > >> > and release APISIX with the same version number,
> e.g.,
> > > 2.8,
> > > > > >> > within a
> > > > > >> > > > >> > manageable time frame after the release of APISIX.
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > 1. APISIX milestones are visible in GitHub.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > 2. After APISIX is released, sort out what is
> different
> > > > > between
> > > > > >> > > APISIX
> > > > > >> > > > >> and
> > > > > >> > > > >> > the previous version, and then adapt it in Dashboard.
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > **Another Phase (Long-term solution)**
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > In addition, I have a long-term plan, the current
> > > > > architecture
> > > > > >> is
> > > > > >> > to
> > > > > >> > > > >> > separate DP and CP, and the ManagerAPI in CP does a
> lot
> > > of
> > > > > >> > functions
> > > > > >> > > > >> that
> > > > > >> > > > >> > AdminAPI duplicates, so we might as well deprecate
> > > > ManagerAPI
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >> > > turn
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Dashboard into **a pure Web project**, directly
> > accessing
> > > > > >> > AdminAPI,
> > > > > >> > > so
> > > > > >> > > > >> that
> > > > > >> > > > >> > when the data in the Request Body is illegal,
> AdminAPI
> > > will
> > > > > >> return
> > > > > >> > > an
> > > > > >> > > > >> error
> > > > > >> > > > >> > directly. Of course, this requires a more detailed
> > > solution
> > > > > >> design
> > > > > >> > > and
> > > > > >> > > > >> is a
> > > > > >> > > > >> > big change.
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > What do you think?
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Best Regards!
> > > > > >> > > > >> > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年7月14日周三
> > > 下午1:46写道:
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Hi,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Currently, Apache APISIX Dashboard and Apache
> APISIX
> > > are
> > > > > two
> > > > > >> > > separate
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > projects (hereinafter referred to as Dashboard and
> > > > APISIX).
> > > > > >> > > Whenever
> > > > > >> > > > >> > APISIX
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > changes the content (e.g., APIs, API fields, Entity
> > > > > >> definitions,
> > > > > >> > > > >> etc.),
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Dashboard needs to match the changes and publish a
> > new
> > > > > >> version.
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Because the Apache APISIX Dashboard's version
> number
> > is
> > > > not
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > same
> > > > > >> > > > >> as
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Apache APISIX, then users get confused when using
> the
> > > > > >> Dashboard,
> > > > > >> > > so I
> > > > > >> > > > >> > draft
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > a proposal to support showing incompatible
> > information
> > > > more
> > > > > >> > > clearer on
> > > > > >> > > > >> > the
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Dashboard.[1]
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Due to there have some prototypes I made, so I put
> > them
> > > > in
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > GitHub
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > issue[1], looking forward to your feedback!
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > [1]
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/issues/1944#issuecomment-879607016
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Best Regards!
> > > > > >> > > > >> > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> *ZhengSong Tu*
> My GitHub: https://github.com/tzssangglass <https://github.com/membphis>
> Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
>

Reply via email to