> Community maintainers should lead us to learn about them as well.

>From the above 3 PRs, I have led us to contribute in a good way.

For the first case:
In https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/4892, I told the contributor:

> Smart people like you should focus on advanced issues.

See https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/4892#issuecomment-906140179

For the second case, I told iamayushdas:
```
First of all, you should discuss this in the mail list
dev@apisix.apache.org before sending a bunch of PRs. It seems only a
few people know this purpose.

Secondly, please modify the doc in a repo first, and evaluate the
effect. Don't change a lot of things. Change it step by step.

Thirdly, it is not a good idea to put a visible mark on an obvious
place. I just spend some time on this issue and get an idea:

Since the doc is pulled from other repo before building it on the
website, we can introduce a preprocessor that converts the invisible
mark to the mark that can be recognized by the render.

I am not sure if it works but at least there is way to achieve the
goal with a better solution.
```

See https://github.com/apache/apisix-website/issues/363#issuecomment-867531022

For the third case, I told Xunzhuo privately that he should focus on
the good first issue.

In all three cases, I have told them how to contribute.

I am sure that I am not the only maintainer of APISIX, so where are
the other maintainers?
iamayushdas has worked for APISIX website for a time, haven't other
maintainers led them how to contribute in the correct way?

Where are the other maintainers? Only me be blamed for missing
leading? I have done it actually.

Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年11月25日周四 下午12:32写道:
>
> > I agree with zexuan's view that no meaningful document modification will
> not bring community activity.
>
> From the above 3 PRs, how to define a meaningful change?
>
> > Apache APISIX has such guidelines[1], we can improve this document
>
> For users who subscribed to this mailing list, how many of us read
> carefully or know exactly about this guideline? I agree to read it before
> involving Apache APISIX's Community, and Community maintainers should lead
> us to learn about them as well.
>
> Best Regards!
> @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
>
>
> Ming Wen <wenm...@apache.org> 于2021年11月25日周四 下午12:17写道:
>
> > Apache APISIX has such guidelines[1], we can improve this document
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/apisix/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
> > Twitter: _WenMing
> >
> >
> > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年11月25日周四 下午12:11写道:
> >
> > > > If any PRs can be accepted, why requires reviewers?
> > >
> > > In my own opinion, lacking a "Contribution Chain/Workflow" is the key
> > point
> > > why Apache APISIX will receive those PRs. We think they know, actually
> > not.
> > >
> > > Best Regards!
> > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > >
> > >
> > > Zexuan Luo <spacewan...@apache.org> 于2021年11月25日周四 下午12:08写道:
> > >
> > > > I think the contributor should learn the basic manner before
> > > contributing.
> > > > Eg, discuss in the community first, don't spam too many non-value
> > > > changes which don't bring a real contribution.
> > > >
> > > > Zexuan Luo <spacewan...@apache.org> 于2021年11月25日周四 下午12:06写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > 2.3 In PR #5592, Xunzhuo wanted to translate docs from English to
> > > > Chinese.
> > > > > 2.3.1 From his changes, I also think those changes are not
> > > > MUST-to-CHANGE,
> > > > > but if we try to understand why he wanted to make those changes, in
> > my
> > > > own
> > > > > opinion, I think he just only wanted to contribute, to translate all
> > > > > English to Chinese to let more Chinese developers read more smoothly.
> > > His
> > > > > original intention was good and active :) Though this kind of change
> > > will
> > > > > increase the Reviewer's burden, we have 39 Apache APISIX members,
> > > right?
> > > > I
> > > > > sincerely hope we could take care of our community's activity.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's incorrect. In that PR he just translates English comments into
> > > > > Chinese doc. It is different from translating docs from English to
> > > > > Chinese.
> > > > >
> > > > > They are two different things. Why do need to change the English
> > > > > comments, because it is not pure Chinese? **Again, he didn't discuss
> > > > > this in the community.**
> > > > >
> > > > > And before he did this, he has been submitted several trivial PRs per
> > > > > day several times, which makes the behavior very skeptical.
> > > > >
> > > > > Zexuan Luo <spacewan...@apache.org> 于2021年11月25日周四 下午12:00写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If any PRs can be accepted, why requires reviewers?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Zexuan Luo <spacewan...@apache.org> 于2021年11月25日周四 上午11:59写道:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The PR #4892 doesn't correct anything. It is retelling the same
> > > > thing in other words. The original statement is already correct.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And if you look at the history carefully, that contributor
> > doesn't
> > > > have a good reputation to submit valuable PR. He didn't discuss what he
> > > did
> > > > in the community.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anyway, we still merge some of his PR which brings real value.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年11月25日周四 上午11:42写道:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1.1 Some communities will reject PRs that developers submit;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1. This feedback comes from attendees, they don't mention
> > Apache
> > > > APISIX has
> > > > > > > > these cases, so I use "some communities" here;
> > > > > > > > 2. I just checked history PRs from here[1], and found some
> > closed
> > > > PRs which
> > > > > > > > are related to Documentations. I reviewed changes and comments,
> > > > emmm, I
> > > > > > > > agree to close some of them due to unnecessary changes or
> > > > reasonable
> > > > > > > > feedbacks, but here are still have some PRs that we could have
> > a
> > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > about, I picked 3 cases from them.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2.1 In PR #4892, one of Douyu's contributors[3] wanted to
> > update
> > > > the Zipkin
> > > > > > > > plugin's docs:
> > > > > > > > 2.1.1 This PR updated doc's title from `Zipkin` to `zipkin`,
> > > > because the
> > > > > > > > author thought it's better to keep the same as other plugins'
> > doc
> > > > title;
> > > > > > > > 2.1.2 This PR changed the description from "Zipkin is a
> > > > OpenTracing plugin"
> > > > > > > > to "zipkin is a plugin for [Zipkin](
> > > > https://github.com/openzipkin/zipkin),
> > > > > > > > which is a distributed tracing system.";
> > > > > > > > 2.1.3 This PR gets a "Requested Changes" finally :( I'm not
> > > > familiar with
> > > > > > > > OpenTracing and Zipkin for now, and cannot see the difference
> > > > between them,
> > > > > > > > so I search Google and here has a "VS" from StackShare[4], it
> > > > seems that
> > > > > > > > the PR's change is reasonable. (also could see #4954)
> > > > > > > > 2.1.4 Maybe this PR change was "trivial" as the comment says,
> > but
> > > > I have to
> > > > > > > > say, everyone likes the correct documentation :) So one
> > > > contributor wants
> > > > > > > > to make our docs more correct and better, why not accept it?
> > > After
> > > > > > > > consideration, though the ASF doesn't ask us to do this, I
> > really
> > > > hope our
> > > > > > > > committers and PMCs[5] help our the most active reviewers to
> > > > review PRs,
> > > > > > > > bcoz everyone's energy is not unlimited, our community needs
> > your
> > > > help to
> > > > > > > > grow and spread.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2.2 In PR #4477, Ayush Das (from India) wanted to use
> > > Docusaurus's
> > > > syntax
> > > > > > > > to have a better rendering effect on Apache APISIX's Docs
> > > website:
> > > > > > > > 2.2.1 I agree with the reviewer's comment: this change will
> > break
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > reading experience by GitHub markdowns for most developers, and
> > > we
> > > > could do
> > > > > > > > this after full discussions. But Ayush Das didn't get that
> > point
> > > > or didn't
> > > > > > > > notice/know the workflow IMO.
> > > > > > > > 2.2.2 It seems that the reviewer is feeling bad about this kind
> > > of
> > > > PRs, I
> > > > > > > > totally can understand the feeling: No other reviewers,
> > Duplicate
> > > > PRs
> > > > > > > > without discussions, and other things will affect our feeling.
> > I
> > > > will feel
> > > > > > > > bad, too :(
> > > > > > > > 2.2.3 We Apache APISIX is a long-term and powerful community
> > like
> > > > other
> > > > > > > > awesome communities, I make sure we will face any kinds of
> > issues
> > > > like
> > > > > > > > this, maybe we could be more friendly to our contributors?
> > > > Community is
> > > > > > > > grown with People, find our powerful users/contributors, get to
> > > > know them
> > > > > > > > :)
> > > > > > > > 2.2.4 Back to this issue, maybe our committers or PMCs can lead
> > > > him to know
> > > > > > > > what's a proper workflow to corporate with the community? It
> > will
> > > > take much
> > > > > > > > time to lead our contributors, they grow, we grow, our
> > community
> > > > grows as
> > > > > > > > well :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2.3 In PR #5592, Xunzhuo wanted to translate docs from English
> > to
> > > > Chinese.
> > > > > > > > 2.3.1 From his changes, I also think those changes are not
> > > > MUST-to-CHANGE,
> > > > > > > > but if we try to understand why he wanted to make those
> > changes,
> > > > in my own
> > > > > > > > opinion, I think he just only wanted to contribute, to
> > translate
> > > > all
> > > > > > > > English to Chinese to let more Chinese developers read more
> > > > smoothly. His
> > > > > > > > original intention was good and active :) Though this kind of
> > > > change will
> > > > > > > > increase the Reviewer's burden, we have 39 Apache APISIX
> > members,
> > > > right? I
> > > > > > > > sincerely hope we could take care of our community's activity.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2.4 I don't mean that we rejected PRs, I only want to encourage
> > > our
> > > > > > > > committers, PMCs to lead our contributors to grow and involve
> > in
> > > > our
> > > > > > > > community.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1.2 Users don't know what or how they can contribute;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes, days ago I heard the same feedback from community members,
> > > > they don't
> > > > > > > > know how to take part in us and what they can do. We "think"
> > they
> > > > know, but
> > > > > > > > actually not for some developers. It seems that there lacks a
> > > > "Contribution
> > > > > > > > Chain".
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I sincerely encourage all of us to take more attention to
> > > > Developers,
> > > > > > > > Codes, Documentations, and Ecosystems, to make our community
> > much
> > > > better!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > https://github.com/apache/apisix/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed
> > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/4892/files
> > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/hnlq715
> > > > > > > > [4] https://stackshare.io/stackups/opentracing-vs-zipkin
> > > > > > > > [5] https://apisix.apache.org/team
> > > > > > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/4477
> > > > > > > > [7] https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/5592/files
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best Regards!
> > > > > > > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ming Wen <wenm...@apache.org> 于2021年11月25日周四 上午9:16写道:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1.1 Some communities will reject PRs that developers
> > submit;
> > > > > > > > > > 1.2 Users don't know what or how they can contribute;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I don't think Apache APISIX has such problems. Are there
> > > > specific issues
> > > > > > > > > and PRs?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
> > > > > > > > > Twitter: _WenMing
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bozhong Yu <imbozh...@gmail.com> 于2021年11月25日周四 上午12:53写道:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > There have a lot of environments and dependencies that
> > need
> > > > to take
> > > > > > > > > > care of or install
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > That's right. Even if I follow the documentation and
> > execute
> > > > make deps, I
> > > > > > > > > > still get errors. Maybe we can add more error handling:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/FAQ/#why-does-the-make-deps-command-fail-in-source-installation
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Baoyuan <baoyuan....@gmail.com> 于2021年11月24日周三 下午11:12写道:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Need an example: how to write my first APISIX plugin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I think it's great.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Zexuan Luo <spacewan...@apache.org> 于2021年11月24日周三
> > > > 下午11:04写道:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Developers need to use Test Nginx to program test
> > > cases,
> > > > but Test
> > > > > > > > > > > > Nginx lacks docs either.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > It's incorrect. They just don't know where to find the
> > > doc:
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://metacpan.org/pod/Test%3A%3ANginx%3A%3ASocket.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > YuanSheng Wang <membp...@apache.org> 于2021年11月24日周三
> > > > 下午10:44写道:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Need an example: how to write my first APISIX plugin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > How about this title?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:33 PM Baoyuan <
> > > > baoyuan....@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought developers could use video and docs to
> > > > share how to
> > > > > > > > > set
> > > > > > > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > development environment, how to write the first
> > line
> > > > of code, how
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > debug
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I very much agree, looking forward to more content
> > > > like this.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ZhengSong Tu <tzssanggl...@gmail.com>
> > 于2021年11月24日周三
> > > > 下午7:45写道:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I used to write Java, and in my personal
> > > experience.
> > > > it take my
> > > > > > > > > > > most
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time to learn APISIX and write plugins.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought developers could use vedio and docs to
> > > > share how to
> > > > > > > > > set
> > > > > > > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > development environment, how to write the first
> > > line
> > > > of code,
> > > > > > > > > how
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > debug,  maybe this would be helpful for newbies.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *ZhengSong Tu*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My GitHub: https://github.com/tzssangglass
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年11月24日周三
> > > > 下午4:26写道:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, community members,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yesterday, one of Apache APISIX's community
> > users
> > > > asked me
> > > > > > > > > how
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > involve
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in our community, so I hold a webinar and share
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > information
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WeChat Group (something like WhatsApp), 20
> > > > developers joined
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > and the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > webinar lasts 90min :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is the summary of this event:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Developer Experience is not good and smooth
> > > for
> > > > newcomers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.1 Some communities will reject PRs that
> > > > developers submit;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.2 Users don't know what or how they can
> > > > contribute;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.3 There has a high bar to develop Apache
> > APISIX
> > > > and its
> > > > > > > > > > > products:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.3.1 There have a lot of Documentations that
> > > lack
> > > > tech
> > > > > > > > > > details,
> > > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > developers need to read and debug from source
> > > > codes;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.3.2 There have a lot of environments and
> > > > dependencies that
> > > > > > > > > > need
> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > take
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > care of or install;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.3.3 Developers need to use Test Nginx to
> > > program
> > > > test
> > > > > > > > > cases,
> > > > > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > > > Test
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nginx lacks docs either. Also, when developers
> > > run
> > > > test cases
> > > > > > > > > > > > locally,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hard to pass all test cases because of
> > > > environmental issues.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.4 Chinese attendees often ask the workflow
> > > about
> > > > how to
> > > > > > > > > > > corporate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > others in the community, they need more courage
> > > > and mentors.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Documentation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.1 We have repos like `apache/apisix`,
> > > > > > > > > > > `apache/apisix-dashboard`,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > `apache/apisix-ingress-controller` and others,
> > > and
> > > > only
> > > > > > > > > > > > `apache/apisix`
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > repo's docs are maintained regularly and
> > > > frequently,
> > > > > > > > > attendees
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > complained
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about the Docs Quality.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.2 Attendees hope our projects could include
> > > > Production Best
> > > > > > > > > > > > Practice
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sections, when users use Apache APISIX, they
> > > could
> > > > easily
> > > > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > appropriate scenarios instead of just seeing a
> > > > demo.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.3 Products
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.3.1 Most attendees complain about Apache
> > APISIX
> > > > Dashboard
> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > just a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > demo,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and it lacks many scenario-based functions. We
> > > > hope it's not
> > > > > > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out-of-box but also reducing the difficulty to
> > > use
> > > > it in
> > > > > > > > > > > > production.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same as Ingress Controller.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there have a lot of issues that our
> > > > developers are
> > > > > > > > > facing,
> > > > > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also a great feeling to hold events like this!
> > > For
> > > > the issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > above,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > kindly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > share your ideas and thoughts :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > *MembPhis*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to