Agreed. One vote for dropping support for Tengine.
Leslie Tsang leslie.ts...@icloud.com > On 20 Dec 2021, at 9:24 PM, Zeping Bai <bzp2...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, Zexuan. > I fully agree with dropping this support. Continuing to support it does > us little good and makes it more difficult to maintain. Also, according > to you, we don't have contributors who are familiar enough with > Tengine. So I think it's time to give up on it. > > Best regards! > Zeping Bai @bzp2010 > > > > Zexuan Luo <spacewan...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:13写道： > >> As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider >> dropping the support of Tengine. >> >> Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this >> month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the support of >> Tengine: >> 1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is >> released years ago. >> 2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor who >> is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to >> work with Tengine. >> 3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported in >> apisix-base. >> 4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not supported >> by Tengine. >> >> By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and >> version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only >> support OpenResty 1.19+. >> >> What about your opinion? >>
