> How much complexity are we willing to trade off for the minority position?
I consider this an important issue, so I am willing to trade a bit of complexity for this feature. I don't want to add a lot of complexity, but a bit. Plus, as apr-util grows, Apache will not want some of the functions that are in it, and Apache may want to statically link it instead of using a shared library, so partial builds are important. > > > I'll include this information in a "project structure" document today. > > > That > > > will cover info for developers: config/build, layout, etc. > > > > Would you mind waiting to pull together that document until this > > discussion is finished? I figure this is going to gell, and we should get > > everything out before we try to document everything. :-) > > There is more to it than directory layout. And whatever I check in can > always be changed. I can certainly wait for a bit, but there have been other > Q&A that I'd like to capture while it is still in my head. I just meant the directory layout discussion part. You are winning me over, but I want to digest this a bit more. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
