On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 02:34:44PM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote: > On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Greg Stein wrote: > > *) Subversion uses autogen.sh > > *) APR and Apache uses buildconf > > *) APRUTIL uses buildconf.sh (I stayed with the buildconf name, but felt > > that adding the .sh was much more declarative about what is going on) > > > > I'm +1 on changing APR and Apache to buildconf.sh. > > And PrintPath, TestCompile, GuessOS, GuessCodeset, CutRule, > MakeEtags, fp2rp, mfhead as well? > > What it is the point of starting a mass orgy of renaming > files?
Who said that I was going to start renaming those? :-) Or anything for that matter? Besides, as I said: the .sh extension is more for the user to know "oh, this is a shell script that I can run." Those other scripts you mention are all "internal" so who cares how they're named? Heck, let's call them script1, script2, and script3. :-) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
