> Besides, as I said: the .sh extension is more for the user to know "oh, this > is a shell script that I can run." Those other scripts you mention are all > "internal" so who cares how they're named? Heck, let's call them script1, > script2, and script3. :-)
May I answer this with a quote of the famous Greg Stein:
"There is a README.dev in the top level of APR. That is
enough.
"Not our fault if people don't read the README.
- Sascha
