On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:53:07AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > rbb 01/01/02 16:53:07 > > > > Modified: lib apr_pools.c > > Log: > > We should not be assigning permanent_pool inside of make_sub_pool. This > > runs the risk of overwriting permanent_pool, which would be VERY bad. By > > moving this back to apr_init_alloc, we know that it should only be called > > by apr_initialize. This does mean that we can NEVER call apr_initialize > > twice in the same program, but that should already be taken care of. > > apr_initialize() has a counter to prevent double-initializations from > happening. This is quite a safe change.
That's what I meant by "but that should already be taken care of." I guess the previous statement should have been we can't "execute the meat of apr_initialize twice in the same program". Oh well, clarity and I have never been good friends. :-) Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
