[ david misfired, and this went straight to me; bringing back to the list ]
Sascha said this wasn't needed on BSDs, but David says "yes". Somebody figure it out :-) Personally, I'd rather avoid the rewrite funkiness and use autoconf substituation to insert the correct value -- it feel much more reliable to me. For example... Makefile.in: @INCLUDE_RULES@ Makefile on most systems: include $(top_builddir)/build/rules.mk Makefile on BSDi systems: .include "$(top_builddir)/build/rules.mk" Seem reasonable? Cheers, -g On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:45:13PM -0000, David Reid wrote: > http://www.apache.org/websrc/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/build/bsd_makefile > > Sascha added this to get the Makefiles in a form that BSDi likes... > > david > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "APR Development List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 5:41 PM > Subject: Re: apr-util build > > > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:44:45PM -0000, David Reid wrote: > > > The build of apr-util is broken on BSDi (needs gmake to build) so I > guess we > > > need to move over Sascha's fix from Apache? Should it be neccesary > though? > > > Sascha? > > > > I don't understand... what part is gmake specific? I don't recall using > > anything in the makefiles that was specific to gmake. > > > > Cheers, > > -g > > > > -- > > Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/ > > -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
