Well, the BSDi fix that Greg applied works fine! So, APR, apr-util and Apache are now building on BSDi again :)
david ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 8:03 PM Subject: Re: apr-util build > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:48:29PM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Greg Stein wrote: > > > > > [ david misfired, and this went straight to me; bringing back to the list ] > > > > > > Sascha said this wasn't needed on BSDs, but David says "yes". > > > > What I said was this: > > > > All BSDs, **except** BSD/OS. > > I didn't know that BSD/OS == BSDi. *shrug* > > >... > > fixed in BSD/OS sooner than later. In the mean-time, the > > remaining four BSD/OS users (one has just passed away :-) can > > use gmake which seems to be installed by default. > > I'm with Ryan: we should just work on the various platforms. It is no big > deal to support this. > > > > Seem reasonable? > > > > AC_OUTPUT and the generated dozens of sed operations and > > multiple sed invocations are slow and ugly. I'd prefer to > > drop BSD/OS make support for now and tell BSD/OS users to use > > gmake. > > I've never been too concerned with that speed. Certainly, it doesn't matter > much for APRUTIL because it has a very simple configure (thankfully, APR > takes care of the bulk). I can see the benefit for Apache, but even then... > it isn't like I run configure every hour and want it to scream. Hell... the > bulk of the time is in the tests -- not the output. > > IOW, I find the AC_OUTPUT replacement scheme used by httpd to be of marginal > benefit. > > Cheers, > -g > > -- > Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/ >
