Brian Behlendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Sam TH wrote: > > Actually, RMS now doesn't have an issue with clause 3, because someone who > satisfies the GPL in redistributing Apache code is also satisfying clause > 3. > > Anyways, I've got some homework to do to make this all official. >
Whatever it takes, Brian. This is really fantastic political work you're doing. I can't wait for a breakthrough. :)
