That is probably the stupid dependency stuff in build2.mk. httpd's buildconf should unconditionally recurse.
But Martin's error is something else, I believe (see other note). I'm testing a fix now. Cheers, -g On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 06:25:40AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have found recently, that buildconf doesn't really do what you expect in > a lot of cases. Namely, it doesn't tend to traverse into srclib/apr and > srclib/apr-util, and run those buildconf's. Try running those manually > right now. I was going to investigate further before posting the bug, but > time isn't being kind to me. :-) > > Ryan > > On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Martin Kraemer wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 05:06:25AM -0800, Greg Stein wrote: > > > No. > > > > > > We run xml/expat/configure, and it produces that Makefile. APRUTIL > > > shouldn't > > > be doing this. Please back out this change. > > > > That is not really true. It definitely did not generate the Makefile, > > that's why I added the patch in the first place. > > > > I always do "buildconf && configure && make clean && make", > > and "make clean" bailed out because the apr-util/xml/expat/Makefile > > was not generated. > > > > Martin. > > -- > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Fujitsu Siemens > > Fon: +49-89-636-46021, FAX: +49-89-636-41143 | 81730 Munich, Germany > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 406 29th St. > San Francisco, CA 94131 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
