On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:19:18AM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:14:58AM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: > > APRUTIL also locates Expat on the system for you, or builds its bundled copy > > of Expat. You could drop your libxml2 dependency. Even better, there has > > been a call for a SAX-like API in APRUTIL, backed by Expat, libxml, or > > Xerces. If you're motivated, you could implement that API for APRUTIL :-) > > Actually I doubt mod_virgule would stick at the SAX level. I didn't > looked at the code but from the exchanges I had with Raph Levien when > he developped it, I'm pretty sure it uses the DOM tree build of libxml2.
DOM tree, libxml 1.8.x. the version on http://virgule.sourceforge.net - xvl [a stand-alone executable] - makes heavy usage of the SAX interface in 2.x. i even use one of the _internal_ SAX functions, and i'm praying you don't delete it from the library! > Now whether switching to Xerces makes sense or not is a question I'm > probably too biased to answer. The irony is that I started libxml in > 99 when trying to build a small WebDAV implementation for Apache. funny, neh :)
