On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:04:09AM -0700, Jon Travis wrote: > Erm, you could always mlock() the memory that gets passed out of the > pool code. More than likely, by making some 'secure' pool, you will > be allocating a lot more than just security data from it (as pools > tend to be abused),
one of the original justifications, jon, for sms, was exactly this: to provide a means to mlock a pool, for security purposes, and not have to change massive amounts of code. luke
