On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Sander Striker wrote: > > Fair enough. It's just that in order to opt-out of the child-pool creating > > process in apr_thread_create, we're going to have to add a parameter > > Why are we so desperate in opting out the child-pool creation? > I don't really have problems with a child pool for each thread. Actually, > it will make the dynamic locking a lot easier to implement if it stays.
The reality is that it should stay. The problem we have right now, is that httpd creates a thread-pool, and then APR creates one. So, if httpd didn't create one, and just used the one APR created automatically, this problem would go away completely. Ryan _____________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
