On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:19:01AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > I would like to move APR to a releasable state finally. To do this, we need > to > finish the locking API at the very least. Does anybody have other issues that > need to be resolved?
Oh, I'd like to consider Sander's pool re-implementation and Madhu's shared memory patch. Both of these don't change the API, so I don't think it affects the "releasability" of APR. (I think releasable state means that no API changes occur without three +1s - code may still be C-T-R - that's my take on it...) They can wait until I get around to it, or someone beats me to it. -- justin
