On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:26:16PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > Other issues before release might be going over all the functions > one more time and check for consistency in argument ordering. > Changes to ordering have been postponed because the functions > were being used in httpd and elsewhere, but I think the release > should be as consistent as possible with respect to argument > ordering for ease of use. I realize this impacts a big ammount > of code, but still think it is worth it. If it is out there > there is no chance of changing the API anymore.
That is a good point. Another thing to check would be things like element type ordering in structs -- ie make sure apr_pool_t's are the first element (I remember something about this from a thread a long time ago. I don't know if it's still necessary, though. It had something to do with accessing private data structures). -aaron
