Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > bnicholes 02/01/04 09:25:49
> >
> > Modified: network_io/win32 sockets.c
> > Log:
> > Deferred the memory allocation for the new apr_socket_t until after the
> > accept()
> > call so that we don't chew up huge chunks of memory when using
> > non-blocking
> > sockets and also avoiding unnecessary memory allocations on error
> > conditions.
>
> I wonder:
>
> . what sort of non-broken program would suffer with the code the way
> it used to be?
>
> . isn't there more total work done now on the normal path?
I meant to clarify that I don't intend this as a complaint. (But I
would prefer to understand these issues before anybody made a similar
change to other, similar code :) )
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
