"Brad Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem with apr_accept() and memory pools is that you give it
> a memory pool to allocate the new socket structure from. The pool isn't
> cleared until after a successful connection is returned by apr_accept()
but that is your choice as the application programmer :)
> Therefore, unless you are clearing
> the pool after every call to apr_accept() (successfull or not) the pool
> that you passed to apr_accept() will continue to grow.
I'm not arguing with you there.
I guess that overall your change to APR sounds reasonable to me.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
