Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check is a lot more than two files, and the port to Windows could be
> kind of tough. The problem is that it requires fork() for a lot of what
> it does, and although I haven't looked at the code in great depth, the
> parts I have looked at just look very Unix based.
It looks like they'd need to abstract it on top of APR! ????? :) :)
> My personal preference is to avoid the GPL all together and go with the
> simple CuTest suite. Any thoughts?
I'd like to avoid GPL all together...
Pier
--
[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different
sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with
the readability of PostScript. [Jamie Zawinski - DNA Lounge - San Francisco]
