Brian Pane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To continue the recent discussions on the problems in the current > apr_poll API, here's a patch for apr_poll.h that illustrates my > proposed fix. > > What I'm proposing here is to split the API into two parts: > > - A lightweight, single-function poll API for use (only!) > with very small sets of descriptors.
Do we really need this API? What is the sort of APR application for which the heavy-duty API is harmful? -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
