> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Brian Pane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > To continue the recent discussions on the problems in the current > > apr_poll API, here's a patch for apr_poll.h that illustrates my > > proposed fix. > > > > What I'm proposing here is to split the API into two parts: > > > > - A lightweight, single-function poll API for use (only!) > > with very small sets of descriptors. > > Do we really need this API? What is the sort of APR application for > which the heavy-duty API is harmful?
I am biting my tongue here, but Jeff, you are the person who specifically stated that the heavy-duty API was too slow for us to use. Ryan
