On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I continue to state that APR's time format should stay as it is. If you > want seconds, use time_t.
Agreed. > Doesn't that completely ignore Cliff's message early in this thread that > specifically stated that he needed microsecond resolution? As long as there's an apr_time_now_in_microseconds() and I'm allowed to determine intervals somehow (which I'm now doing by subtracting two time values), I could care less what else happens. --Cliff
