* Justin Erenkrantz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:46:33AM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: > > I just wanted to hilite this change, in case people missed it. Our output > > library now looks like: libapr-0.so > > > > (and when we release 1.x.y it will be libapr-1.so) > > > > If you've got problems or concerns or whatever with the change, then now is > > the time :-) > > > > [ note: I also plan to shift the includes into INCLUDEDIR/apr-1/* ] > > My gut reaction is "Yuck" as I don't like this approach. > > To me, this is completely useless as I install each program in its > own specific directory keyed off the entire version number, so apr > would go to /pkg/apr-0.9.0/. Therefore, this scheme is only meant > for people who install to /usr, which, IMHO, is a not-so-good idea. > > For those people packaging APR, the configure script options should > be powerful enough to let them tweak all of the directories without > us forcing this scheme upon them. > > But, I'm curious what others think. -- justin
(with debian and apr hacker hats on) I think that Greg's proposal is a good thing; having the install scheme be consistent across distributions - because we're doing it rather than each distributor taking their own approach - is gonna make life easier for everyone. So, +1 to (both) Greg's proposals from here. -Thom -- Thom May -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Personally, I quite like the little pictures they display when things are > scanned. Just so you know what a zucchini looks like before you go > throwing your money away on one. "Oh shit! Is that zucchini? It said OREOS on the shelf!"
